Kirkleigh Camping Somerset

Paol rules, especially the Forum leaders to protect - victims zero

Four days after Blog chronically live & Forum simple but unambiguous and workable rules for behavior on suspicion of sexual assault had formulated, has a Paol "working group" under the self-appointed chairman Robert K. likewise a kind of rules tries.

over the satirical side of the highly sought efforts of K. & Co., we have already reported. But laugh the whole thing is not absolute. I have therefore even bothered to take some of the passages Paol-Elaborate seriously and to comment briefly. I consider this critical comparison of solution approaches and Paol in chronic live as legitimate and important. After all, look at concrete cases of sexual Überfriffe (at least four in the past two years). What

uncomfortable at first touch: the Paol-solution process is consistent to the data (the victims) by age. It is once more about the chosen victim. Chronic life-scheme, however, was of course in cooperation and in consultation with victims and designed veranschiedet.

Here deer Paol original text. My comment is formatted and color-coded red recovered.

Norbert Jos Maas

_____________________________________________________________

Hello,
aüsdrücklicher agreement with the 1 Chairman has developed a small group of users with a text, working title was ". Bededingungen Additional Paol for users of the chat, while use of a cam system." This text must be at an appropriate point of the chat iis system can be set.

Paol The chat is a free service of the Association. Who the chat u / o. a cam used accepted irrevocable in all parts of the following conditions.
Sexual harassment is a "crime against sexual self-determination." A sexual offense as defined in the law and the existing technical environment is always present when the sexual behavior of one side of the parties is considered undesirable and is considered an insult. It may be in words, gestures or actions, such as the vector representation of the unclothed body parts. In cases of sexual harassment can be women and men, the victim or the perpetrator.

______________________________________________

a truism - true but as far as

______________________________________________

Unwanted sexual activity lead to the victims often traumatized reactions to depression and stress reactions . And they are often triggered by anxiety and psychosomatic symptoms. It is a special concern of Paol, protect its users against. Such behavior is most insidious, because the existing underlying disease verschimmert themselves by providing the complaints about the sexual act.

______________________________________________


a truism - but where does
______________________________________________

Ignore and repression is the least effective way of dealing with them as victims of sexual Handlung.Sorgen immediately clear and unambiguous conditions. The simplest by the cutting off of the online connection between the perpetrator and victim. They say if opportunities unambiguous manner their strict rejection of such conduct. Keep in mind that the victim has the power over the conduct of harassment to determine, because they alone have it in hand, put up almost by a button, the harassment to an end

______________________________________________

Here again the victims of the responsibility for the deed is presented. "Those who do not turn off, has just had bad luck - and is ultimately responsible" - the tenor of this statement.

______________________________________________

Unfortunately Paol has no factual or legal means to a sexual harassment to final assessment. We depend solely on the subjective testimony of the parties. This almost always leads to a situation known as "word against another's." Then uses the principle of law "in the benefit of the doubt", which means impunity for alleged perpetrators. Only an auxiliary construction, which detects a lack of reasonableness to all users and industrial peace at risk as regards when the suspected offender is still active as a user. Then the club courts react with the maximum possible penalty, the exclusion from the association. Further options are Paol not available.

______________________________________________

We are not in the courtroom but in a private room, which is partly open to the public. This is definitely the house rules. As is argued here, are fundamentally innocent offender, possibly disturbing the "industrial peace" - Which company operates Paol? And who is the "Association of Trial"? A farce.

______________________________________________


If the victim focuses on a further punishment of the offender, should Paol pursue legal action. The final decision may be to determine a specific gravity of the offense and can also feed it to verdict. At the discretion of the court are an indictment under Penal Code § 183 (exhibitionism) or § 183 a StGB (excitation of a public nuisance) is possible. In both cases prison sentences of up to one year. The final verdict is also a prerequisite for further civil claims against the offender. However, but is also a criminal case against the accusers to § § 164 ff of the Criminal Code (false accusation) possible with a penalty of up to five years imprisonment.
stand with the legal process of investigation all necessary tools available (forensics, psychological assessments, duty of truth in the statements, etc) ..

______________________________________________

truism that aims miles in 99 percent of cases, the reality of life and suffering of the victims over. Moreover, it is not matter of Paol to require the victims, what they're dealing kindly. Arrogance à la Paol leadership.

______________________________________________

The practice shows that more aggravating circumstances are as follows: acquisition of all the costs and payment of legal fees of both parties. The crime statistics shows that the perpetrators of sexual acts of this nature usually married or in partnerships, living men. By the inevitable announcement of the fact, were likely to occur also have consequences for the offender in his personal life. We would like to point out that such processes may be performed only by natural persons and we shall all claims against Paol. For whatever legal reason, we reject this also for a cost-sharing how the costs of obtaining legal advice or participation in the process risk.

______________________________________________

This is only a question of freeing the people at Paol (club and forum) from any responsibility. Legally, this may be correct. From the moral complicity sick can not acquit those responsible - if they continue to behave as in the past two years.

______________________________________________

for receiving information about such incidents but the board is responsible, in consultation can also give advice be agreed upon by appropriate members of Paol. Responsible for the intervention of the Court Association and the immediate enforcement of the penalties remain the club board. We will interrupt with the announcement of the incident once the connection between victim and perpetrator, cause a report of the suspect and arrange in a further consequence, the exclusion from the association. Paol will take into account the outcome of the Final Judgement and Punishment at the club. The confidentiality of the incident is guaranteed. "

______________________________________________
is the crucial sentence:" The confidentiality of the incident is guaranteed "exactly the same pattern Those responsible have acted before. Everything should remain hidden. can limit that only absolute openness (while maintaining privacy, especially the victim) sexual assault, will be further denied.
______________________________________________

Outside of the above text bring such to the drafting of the proposal charge that we see in agreement after careful consideration, the proposed approach as the best solution to the greatest possible protection is cause against such criminal acts and operations, as currently currently be prevented, most likely .. . The competent body association is asked to implement the proposal into reality. I do suggest that a supplement in the GO would be necessary.
The Author: Robert Kreitmeier (Kant), Lotte Müller (Liesel), Christian Scharein (Chris)