Bump On Soft Palate Abscess

Rosa


Whenever news of reach or Clarence Mitchell, the media, ringing alarm bells with me. Nothing is as it seems with him and the art lies in deciphering the message, which is behind several layers of more or less artful confusion. scattered

So when the news of the BBC was , he would probably be a victim of malicious reporters who had tried his cell phone and his voicemail hack, I was really clear that it was here for something completely different and the current media hype to the wiretapping scandal was used News of the World, for something completely different to pack.

allegedly came from the initiative occasionally for the BBC working Jon Manel , who, after he will have experienced in September last year "rumors" about a possible phone hack at Mitchell from unnamed source, the same was immediately called. Mitchell researched during his telephone provider Vodafone, der ihm einen 36-seitigen Bericht seines Servicecenters vorlegte. Darin entdeckte Mitchell u.a. folgenden Vorfall:

The first ones were on the 29th of February, 2008. The operator lists it saying a gentleman had called wishing to check the phone as he gets calls each night from the number and wanting information and is, quotes, “a witness on the CID trial for McCanns”. Well that doesn’t make sense. It certainly wasn’t me that made that call. I would never use that phraseology and there is, there was no such thing as a CID trial for the McCanns. Its ridiculous. That appears to me to be a blatant attempt to get information about whose number it was and what was happening. Thankfully the operator didn’t give him any.

I conclude: A man called on 2/29/2008 at the Vodafone service, and complained that calls him every night, Mitchell's mobile phone and information it requires. Whether the complainant is now spent as a witness in the criminal case or the McCann unwanted calls is not entirely clear, but it makes more sense in the first case clearly.

What if you please, a reporter to reach over Mitchell's phone number to complain to except the name of the owner to come? There would be enough to simply choose the number right? From a Hackerattempt can certainly not be spoken.

If it was not a reporter, not a hack, but what was it? Maybe just for a change the truth? Namely, someone who complained because he was getting harassed at night from this number? And maybe even a witness in the case of McCann was? What a sacrilege! To prevent possible speculation in this direction is equal to advance the bolt and the bad reporters blame, Mr. Mitchell could perhaps his house and home station, the BBC have tried? If you already have such great relationships ...

Which brings us to the next question brings pure hypothethischen, who was the witness who was there at night torn from sleep, was abducted by someone of Clarence Mitchell's phone? Perhaps one of the witnesses, after the above date of the British police on behalf of the PJ should be again questioned in detail? The questions had arrived and people were so defined in the Request Rogatory of that at the time mitlerweile in England. Should there have been a leak? That, God forbid, the Arguidos about the content communicated in intricate ways got? No, that I can not believe.

.................................

interesting and totally unrelated to the above is that the only evidence that is provided in these documents with a phone number, the waiter, who was the Daily Express as "on the run" means . The witness, originally Gerry's alibi for the time of Smith sighting was not confirmed and a much later date for the departure of the group from the table and stated pushed the more than one hour forward in his interrogation by the British . So Gerry had his alibi since he had the waiter now suddenly seen in person the pool scan. The Attorney General could then present the case to the Court ...

I try now Jenifer Murat, the mother of Robert Murat, who claimed according to the Express following:

The mother of British expat Robert Murat estate agent 'the only other suspect in the case' has accused investigators of bribing witnesses into changing their stories.