the journal Russell O'Liar 2 I have already described the opportunity to have the participation of Maddie on the Thursday evening meal can be simulated. And was attended by all groups, an estimated more than 20 children and not all caregivers were off for it. A lack of Maddie there probably would not have noticed, especially if E *** together with the twins and their parents would have eaten there. But how was a delusion during the day possible, where they both morning and afternoon in the Kids Club was registered as present?
The organizer Mark Warner attached great importance to good child care to suggest, after all, he was several times because of poor care been in the headlines .
It was suggested that the children in small groups of up to 6 children always by the same supervisor was supervised. In the analysis of statements result but some contradictions to this claim:
- In the first week of May was a separate group of 60-10 year old Junior from 7 children usually lack of funds was not reached. Therefore, they were looked after in the same room as the 12 children of the group of 3-5 year old. Nominally, this consisted of 2 groups, the Sharks and lobsters with 6 children, but in fact they were all housed together in a room above the reception desk. This also explains strange statement from Amy Thierny , Madeleine was playing with the older children preferred.
- The group of children was so great that Emma Wilding, a supervisor of the Sharks , the outing of the children to the beach on Wednesday afternoon was not certain whether Madeleine was not here or now.
- That the supervisor changed before, because other tasks were, says Kirsty Maryan in connection with the same trip to the beach in which Emma Wilding had left the group to assist in the preparation of dinner to help.
- The dear Jane, "blurted" at first questioned, a little on the organization of children's clubs. She speaks four or five (!) supervisors who were responsible for the group of children in the space above the front desk. After all, her daughter was attending, they should know also.
Knowing these conditions, it is not hard to imagine that an entry or discharge from the "register" the club could also be done silently. One example is the accidental entry of Mr. Carpenter for his daughter on Tuesday, when he enters in the wrong group. This was later crossed out, showing but that it is certainly possible, these Rough Paper is to manipulate.
Provided that these conditions were the police on 4 May the two supervisors by Mark Warner made available for interviews, which were allegedly responsible only for the three children of the McCanns. Both quote almost exclusively from the above-mentioned lubricating read labels, where the times for the Thursday after . Other employees are not supposed to be available because they have to work. These all will be questioned later also at the insistence of the police.
Considering now how many Nannies in alternating layers, for the very large Madeleine's group were responsible and that Catriona Baker in the first survey only the list of attendance cited, one can imagine how difficult it would become for them later to add a possible uncertainty regarding the presence of Madeleine's on Thursday. The written confirmation of their presence, and a protest of desperate parents would have every young girl to be careful to admit their uncertainty. Especially with the pressure of the employer in the back.
is also worth noting that Mark Warner had flown immediately after the disappearance of the Control Risk Group, to assist in the specification, the McCanns, but certainly there in the first place for to safeguard the interests of Mark Warner. Whereupon the statements regarding the Thursday suddenly got more content ....
... And then the workers were all on 13 May be shipped to Greece and the police were no longer available.
Edit:
All statements of all workers have been translated by Robert Murat. If this was the main reason why he was staged as a suspect? To a possible process any statements that he had translated to discredit and to question?
0 comments:
Post a Comment