Before the Internet age, I loved puzzles. The larger the better. The best moment for me was not to use the final piece. The best moment was when suddenly recognized by a relatively insignificant particles the whole picture and you knew that you had made the breakthrough. The remaining parts appended then relative easy in the now famous picture. I went
Just a few days ago, when a hitherto never noticed Jane Tanner's statement a puzzle piece to add left and suddenly found the case discussed here the whole picture. Previously it was working on the various "islands of color" as the Smith sighting, the time line of the 3rd May, the discrepancies in the statements and other seemingly non-compatible individual problems. Now we suddenly realized Relationships that previously made no sense.
I always have assumed that the claim would have Madeleine on the morning of the 3rd May at her parents complained that they had left her crying alone in the apartment, had arisen because the parents of the incident of a screaming child from 1 to 2nd wanted to relocate May, on the one hand to discredit Mrs. Fenn as a witness and to prove the other hand, that Madeleine on the evening of 2 May (and, of course, on 3 May) was still alive. If you were sure that Madeleine in the early evening of 2 May was still alive, this statement gets a different meaning.
Yes, she had also cried on Wednesday but we did not know whether Mrs. Fenn had heard this. You knew that they had heard a scream on Tuesday, but it seemed likely that the police a statement on Wednesday decisive had deliberately withheld.
So you had to qualify the much greater outcry on Wednesday. In many television interviews as the crying was irrelevant, as briefly described before the Zubettbringen wines. Cleverly was always spoken in the form of WE, although Gerry briefly to shower in the apartment was and then immediately went ahead to the restaurant and had a stressed-out Kate with a hysterical child and 2 children alone.
Jane also had now the story of her daughter telling rampage, which from the playground to Zubettbringen stretched. Could this explain the noise, had heard that Mrs. Fenn maybe? 5D - the apartment of Tanner / O'Brien, however, was quite far away from 5A. In the event that you would not believe, nor Rachael told a strange story that had me confused for years and is now explained.
It indicates that Ella, Jane's daughter was bathing in one evening with them along with their daughter. Is not the day but surely. A nearly 4-year-old takes a bath in a strange apartment without her sister or mother with a baby that also still has diarrhea? Now if you guessed the big picture, can also This puzzle pieces to place. If the explanation was not sufficient with the rampage of Jane's daughter, could have been cited too noisy and screaming kids in the bath, the bathroom was right next to Madeleine's nursery. Old Mrs. Fenn had not safely distinguish.
the many hours of crying on Tuesday was so for us the viewer only became significant because we knew of him. The recent cries on Wednesday we had never seen such a blind spot, because we focused on the Tuesday.
I'm sure will find in the next few weeks, many pieces of the puzzle their way into the big picture. A fixed time of death is certainly a big step in the right direction. And the best part: If a death before 3 May have to prove it does not require corpse to a possible conviction.
Jane Tanner: "She was so tired she been just sort of crashed and screamed during bath time I think that might have, I'm not sure if that was the Wednesday, it could have been the Wednesday but she. just had a complete, you know how the kids do when they're tired, complete meltdown and there's screaming and they're so tired it was quite hard to settle her but then she just, she just crashed but, there what, I think that was the Wednesday night "
RIP
0 comments:
Post a Comment